Thursday, July 19, 2012

Pitfalls in Publishing by David Farland

For more than a year now, I’ve tried to avoid talking about the changing book industry. This is a writing newsletter, not an industry newsletter. Publishing has always been evolving, and you’ll see that if you take a snapshot of the industry from the 1880s or the 1990s and compare it to now. But the changes are pretty far-reaching, and there are some people who don’t seem to realize how dramatic those changes will become.
I’m just going to list some of the things that are happening, with very little editorializing. I’m not going to hit every little thing that has happened, so you may need to fill in the blanks.
The world is changing from paper books to electronic books.
This started with Amazon.com introducing the Kindle, an e-reader whose low price was attractive. However, it can’t be overemphasized that Amazon.com was already the nation’s single largest bookstore. The Kindle found an audience of book-buyers who made perfect customers. The new Kindle allowed readers to instantly download their books, anytime, anyplace, and pay less for them. It let readers shop more efficiently—no more long trips to bookstores.
Amazon’s competitor, Barnes and Noble, accepted Amazon’s challenge and created its own e-reader: the Nook. But a little over 18 months ago, Borders, the second largest book chain, was already in trouble, with a shrinking market share.
Hampered by high debts that it had been carrying for years, Borders was forced into bankruptcy.
Many people thought that other brick-and-mortar bookstores would see a sharp surge in sales as shoppers went elsewhere to buy paper books. After all, Borders had about 30% of the market. Instead, shoppers went electronic. E-book sales rose from about 30% of the total sales to over 50% of book sales about 18 months ago.
Barnes and Noble, the second-largest retailer in the market, re-designed its stores so that they could put more emphasis on selling their Nook, along with games and toys. Thus, they cut their inventory of paper books by about 30%, and this move was a success. Their busiest day in 2010 came on Christmas, when they sold more books than on any other day of the year—when all of their stores were closed! So e-book sales were pushed well beyond the 50% mark.
In January 2011, Amanda Hocking became the first person to become a multimillionaire by selling her own electronic books. Several other authors have begun to follow. Even traditional authors are seeing their sales move from print to digital. Paperback book sales are shrinking dramatically as publishers quit re-printing old titles and let them come out only in digital. In the past six months, my own e-book sales have skyrocketed. I’m currently making much more from electronic sales than I am making on paper sales.
This is true even for new releases. For example, in April one author I know released his hardcover novel, one in a series, to good strong sales—7,000 copies in the first week. But the book sold another 11,500 copies digitally that week, even though the price was at $16.95 per digital book. In other words, most of the readers who had faithfully been collecting the books in hardcover for years simply transitioned to electronic format.
With the opening market for e-books, a lot of authors are going Indie, but are finding that with the stiff competition, it’s hard even for an Indie author to sell well. You can’t just have a good book, they’re discovering, you’ve also got to have great marketing.
So the market is tough. In an effort to get good reviews, I’ve heard that a lot of indie authors are trading reviews—asking strangers to give them raves in exchange for their own raves about the stranger’s book. This kind of incestuous behavior is backfiring. I recently heard one attendee at a book conference say, “I won’t buy indie books anymore, because you just can’t trust the reviews.” Another writer said, “Yeah, but you can’t trust the big names, either. They just write reviews for their friends.” So authors seeking reviews have a quandary. Bestselling authors are busy. It’s hard to get one who is a complete stranger to look at your book for book quotes. Even if you get them, readers have learned to tune out.
Of course, you can hire reviewers at places like Kirkus to write reviews, but those reviews aren’t completely unbiased either.
So getting great reviews isn’t necessarily a good way to attract attention anymore, I’m afraid. We need something else. Even if you do get good reviews, there are people on the internet who like to bash good books and movies in order to gratify their own egos. They’ll dis a book that they haven’t read. Even if people love your work, and are vocal about it, it will backfire.
With paper book sales plummeting, many authors are taking their backlists and selling the titles as e-books. This is good for the author and the fans, but it is hurting the store owners. One author that recently went on a book tour mentioned that at the indie bookstores, he had a couple of store owners complain about authors who sell their backlist, cutting out the bookstore owners. These bookstore owners are taking it as a personal insult, and in some cases may be refusing to support authors who publish e-books. I’d love to find a way to keep them in the loop, and Dean Smith’s idea of selling books as e-books using gift certificates at stores is one great way to do this. We just haven’t found a system to implement this plan.
At the same time, publishers are upset about being cut out of the loop, too. The publishers want to sell authors’ titles as e-books, and several class-action lawsuits have been filed by authors alleging that publishers have been accused of stealing e-book rights, under-reporting sales, or fixing prices on e-books.
The publishers want e-rights so badly, that one best-selling author I know who recently published a nonfiction e-book, found that when he took his next fiction proposal to his publisher, it was soundly rejected. Why? As one person on the acquisitions team said, “If the book is any good, why doesn’t he just publish it himself?” So authors who publish their own backlists may be finding that they face a backlash from publishers.
What does all of this mean? A lot of authors are looking at the markets and trying to decide whether to publish traditionally or as indies. I’m not going to make that assessment for you, but you should know that no matter what route you take, there are potholes and pitfalls.
Tread carefully.

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Celebrating the Fourth

 
When celebrating the Fourth of July, we often forget the simple freedoms that liberty offers to writers. Instead of distributing our witticisms via underground newspapers, anyone can write anything and post it on a blog, like this one. Instead of enduring government control over what we write about, we can pen original or inspiring thoughts on a plethora of subjects freely, whenever and however we wish. Critics used to control what was published through ruthless editing. Today, there is so little editing that the hunger for a few cleansing edits, here and there, is almost universally acknowledged.

Here are a few quotes on the writing freedom we now enjoy:

"If they give you ruled paper, write the other way."
Ray Bradbury
"Nobody can make us write what we don't want to write."
William Zinsser
"Writing is a form of personal freedom."
 Don Delillo

In short, there are more opportunities for writers to express themselves, today, than ever before in the history of civilized man. Take advantage of this grand freedom.

Write…and be grateful for the privilege!   

Monday, July 2, 2012

Five Common Writing Blunders by Kirsten Lamb

Five Common Writing Blunders by Kirsten Lamb

I generally like blogging about the larger issues, namely structure, because that is the killer. If the story’s plot is fatally flawed there’s little hope of connecting with a reader. If we need a Dungeon Master Guide, a GPS and a team of sherpas to navigate our story’s plot, then finding an agent is the least of our worries. So plot matters, but, to be blunt, there other rookie mistakes that can land us in a slush pile before an agent (or reader) even gets far enough to notice a problem with plot.
So today I am putting on my editor’s hat and going to give you a peek into what agents and editors (and even readers) see in those first 5-25 pages that can make us lose interest.
If Your Novel has More Characters than the Cast of Ben Hur, You Might Need Revision...
Whenever the author takes the time to name a character, that is a subtle clue to the reader that this is a major character and we need to pay attention. Think Hollywood and movies. If the credits roll and there is a named character in the credits, then we can rest assured this character had a speaking part. Many characters in our novels will be what NYTSBA Bob Mayer calls “spear carriers.” Spear carriers do not need names.
I did not know this, years ago, and I felt the need to name the pizza guy, the florist, the baker and the candlestick maker. Do NOT do this. When we name characters, it is telling our readers to care. Sort of like animals. Only name them if you plan on getting attached.
We do not have to know intimate life details about the waitress, the taxi driver or even the funeral director. Unless the character serves a role—protagonist, antagonist, allies, mentor, love interest, minions, etc.—you really don’t need to give them a name. They are props, not people.
And maybe your book has a large cast; that is okay. Don’t feel the need to introduce them all at once. If I have to keep up with 10 names on the first page, it’s confusing, ergo annoying. Readers (and agents) will feel the same way.
If Your Novel Dumps the Reader Right into Major Action, You Might Need Revision...
Oh, there is no newbie blunder I didn’t make.
Anastasia leaned out over the yawning chasm below, and yelled to Drake. She needed her glue-sticks and Bedazzler if she ever was going to diffuse the bomb in time. Blood ran down her face as she reached out for Dakota’s hand. They only had minutes before Xing Xio would be back and then it would all be over for Fifi, Gerturde and Muffin.
Okay, I just smashed two into one. Your first question might be, Who the hell are these people? And likely your second question is Why do I care?
Thing is, you don’t care. You aren’t the writer who knows these characters and is vested. We have discussed before how Normal World plays a vital role in narrative structure. As an editor, if I see the main character sobbing at a funeral or a hospital or hanging over a shark tank by page three, that is a big red flag the writer doesn’t understand narrative structure.
Thing is, maybe you do. But, if we are new and unknown and querying agents, these guys get a lot of submissions. And, if our first five pages shout that we don’t understand narrative structure, our pages are likely to end up in the slush pile.  Also, here is the thing about narrative structure. It is hardwired into our brains. Even three-year-olds "get" narrative structure. Don't believe me? Try to skip part of Where the Wild Things Are and see what happens.
If three act structure is wired into the human brain, why mess with what works? Besides, when we are new, we get less leeway about trying to reinvent narrative structure, and the thing is---and I can't emphasize this enough---three-act structure has worked since Aristotle came up with it. There are better uses of time than us trying to totally remake dramatic structure.
It’s like the wheel. Round. It rolls. The wheel works. Don’t mess with the wheel. Don't mess with narrative structure.
Some other picky no-nos… .
Painful and Alien Movement of Body Parts...
Her eyes flew to the other end of the restaurant.
 His head followed her across the room.
All I have to say is… “Ouch.”
Make sure your character keeps all body parts attached. Her gaze can follow a person and so can her stare, but if her eyes follow? The carpet gets them fuzzy with dust bunnies and then they don’t slide back in her sockets as easily.
Too much Physiology…
Her heart pounded. Her heart hammered. Her pulse beat in her head. Her breath came in choking sobs.
After a page of this? I need a nap. After two pages? I need a drink. We can only take so much heart pounding, thrumming, hammering before we just get worn out.  That and I read a lot of entries where the character has her heart hammering so much, I am waiting for her to slip into cardiac arrest at any moment. Ease up on the physiology. Less is often more.
Again, I will recommend Angela Ackerman and Becca Puglisi's Emotion Thesaurus. This is an inexpensive tool that will keep you from beating up the same words/descriptions. You can thank me later ;).
Info-Dump...
The beginning of the novel starts the reader off with lengthy history or world-building. The author pores on and on about details of a city or civilization or some alien history all to “set up” the story.
In my experience, this is often the hallmark of a writer who is weak when it comes to characters and even plotting. How can I tell? He begins with his strength---lots of intricate details about a painstakingly crafted world. Although not set in stone, generally, if the author dumps a huge chunk of information at the start of the book, then he is likely to use this tactic throughout.
This type of beginning tells me that author is not yet strong enough to blend information into the narrative in a way that it doesn’t disrupt the story. The narrative then becomes like riding in a car with someone who relies on hitting the brakes to modulate speed. The story likely will just get flowing…and then the writer will stop to give an information dump.
Also, readers read fiction for stories. We read Wikipedia for information. Information does not a plot make. Facts and details are to support the story that will be driven by characters with human wants and needs. 
Sci-fi/fantasy writers are some of the worst offenders. It is easy to fall in love with our world-building and forget we need a plot with players. Keep the priorities straight. In twenty years people won't remember gizmos, they will remember people.
I will do more of these in the future, but the points I mentioned today are very common errors. Many editors and agents will look for these oopses to narrow down the stack of who to read. These are also habits that can frustrate readers should the book make it to publication.
To learn more, visit Kirsten at her website:
http://warriorwriters.wordpress.com/author/warriorwriters/